—
The Curious Case of “This’s”: When Informal Speech Collides with Grammar Rules
Picture this: you’re texting a friend about a new coffee shop, typing excitedly, *”Dude, this’s the spot!”* Pause. Rewind. Did you just commit a grammatical crime? Welcome to the wild world of contractions—where convenience clashes with correctness, and regional dialects throw shade at textbook rules. Today, we’re dissecting the rogue contraction *”this’s,”* a linguistic rebel that’s everywhere in casual chatter but banned from formal writing. Buckle up, grammar sleuths—this case is juicier than a Black Friday sale gone wrong.

The Anatomy of a Contraction Gone Rogue

Contractions are the duct tape of language—quick, efficient, and occasionally messy. Standard ones like *”it’s”* (it is) or *”they’re”* (they are) are grammar-class darlings. But *”this’s”*? Oh, it’s the thrift-store find of contractions: beloved in certain circles, suspicious to purists. The issue? That sneaky apostrophe. In *”it’s,”* the apostrophe replaces a dropped *”i”* from *”is.”* But *”this’s”* tries to cram *”this is”* into a single syllable, leaving the apostrophe looking like a misplaced possession marker (*”this’s book”* = *”this is book”* or *”this possesses book”?* Chaos.).
Regional dialects adore this chaos. In Australia, *”This’s the place”* rolls off the tongue like Vegemite on toast. Southern U.S. dialects might drawl it out as *”this’s where y’all park the truck.”* Yet, grammarians clutch their pearls: *”This’s”* isn’t just informal—it’s *nonstandard*, a fancy way of saying *”nope, not in the rulebook.”*

Formal vs. Informal: The Great Grammar Divide

Here’s where things get spicy. Language isn’t just about rules—it’s about *audience.* Slip *”this’s”* into a novel’s dialogue to flavor a character’s voice? Brilliant. Use it in a cover letter? *”Dear Hiring Manager, this’s why you should hire me…”* Cue the auto-rejection pile.
Professional and academic writing demand *”this is”* for clarity. Why? Because contractions can muddy meaning. Imagine a legal contract: *”This’s binding”* vs. *”This is binding.”* The latter leaves zero room for misinterpretation (or lawsuits). Even in creative writing, authors like Twain or Zadie Smith bend grammar rules *intentionally*—to evoke dialect, humor, or rhythm. The key? Know the rules before you break ’em.

Possession vs. Contraction: The Apostrophe’s Identity Crisis

The apostrophe in *”this’s”* suffers an existential crisis. Is it marking possession (*”this’s meaning”*) or contraction (*”this is meaning”*)? English already has *”its”* (possession) vs. *”it’s”* (contraction)—a duo notorious for tripping up even native speakers. Adding *”this’s”* to the mix is like tossing a smoke bomb into a grammar police lineup.
Compare:
– Correct: *”This is my pen.”* (Contraction avoided.)
– Confusing: *”This’s my pen.”* (Is *”this”* owning something? Is *”pen”* a verb? Panic ensues.)
The fix? Stick to *”this is”* in writing. Save *”this’s”* for texts, memes, or that one uncle who thinks grammar rules are *”government propaganda.”*

The Verdict: When to Use (and Abuse) “This’s”

Language evolves, but some hills are worth defending. *”This’s”* might feel natural in speech, but writing demands precision. Here’s the cheat sheet:
– Formal writing: *”This is”* only. Resumes, essays, and emails to your boss aren’t the place for rebellion.
– Creative writing: *”This’s”* is fair game if it serves character or setting—but footnote it with *”dialogue, not dogma.”*
– Informal contexts: Text it, tweet it, yell it across a crowded bar. Just don’t blame us when autocorrect fights back.
And hey, if you’re clinging to *”this’s”* like a vintage band tee, own it—but know the stakes. Grammar isn’t about elitism; it’s about being understood. Now, if you’ll excuse me, *this’s* the end of the article… or should I say, *this is*? Case closed.
—